On the 75th anniversary of the NBA, the official list of the 75 historical superstars has arrived, which has made many media outlets eager to release their own lists. To be honest, these lists should be viewed in a lively manner, while some media outlets find the liveliness insufficient and give the current 75 star rankings. How objective can this list be?
Simply put, in this list, the rankings of several outstanding current football stars are ranked first by Alphabet, with Durant, Jokic, Embid, and James ranked 2-5 respectively. It seems that this list is quite objective. Alphabet has been rapidly rising in the past two years, and this season, while Middleton is close to being eliminated, he even made it to the Eastern Conference semi-finals, which can be said to rely entirely on Alphabet. And Durant's competitive form is also quite good, ranking second can only be said to be barely strong. You should know that he completely lost his true spirit of death in the playoffs.
It is somewhat surprising that James is not as good as the two super centers in the league. Jokic is definitely worth this position this season, but it's a bit problematic to be taller than Jang Huang. Do you know what form Jang Huang has been in this season? If we were to follow the record, then why didn't Tatum and Curry make it to the top five? So this kind of ranking is just a look. At the age of almost 37, Zhan Huang is carrying the team forward alone and has also produced very good personal data. Can you say that the former king is already old? It is obviously impossible.
Among the other popular superstars in the alliance, Curry ranked sixth, Harden went straight to 18th, and Weishao ranked 65th. I really can't see where this media's ranking is. Is it based on who gets sprayed the most and ranks behind? So why is Owen able to be in 13th place, even Paul George, who has been out of action for most of the season due to injury, has a head start over Harden. Harden's performance this season is indeed regrettable, but Dengo is also injured. It's just that he didn't choose to take a break like the Clippers, but instead wanted to continue playing on the field.
As for Curry, he broke the three-point record this season, and the playoffs directly opened up a rampage mode. Why can he be worse than these people who haven't even made it to the finals? You should know that Curry currently averages 34.3 points per game in the NBA Finals. What players are able to achieve these goals? Jordan, O'Neal, and even Kobe have never achieved this, which shows what kind of competitive state Curry is currently in. However, there is no Leonard on this list at all. He has been reimbursed this season, so they should be ranked based on their performance this season. However, there are too many subjective factors involved in this.The detailed ranking is as follows:
1-5: Letter Brother, Durant, Joachim, Embid, James
6-10: Curry, Dongqiqi, Tatum, Morant, Booker
11-15: Drozan, Trey Young, Owen, Paul, George
16-20: Butler, Brown, Harden, Seacam, Downs
21-25: Mitchell, Adebayor, Middleton, Van Fleite, Raven
26-30: Holliday, Galan, Chasing Dreams, Gobel, Thick Eyebrow Brother
31-35: Ingram, Edwards, three goals, McCollem, Murray
36-40: Tang Shen, Alexander, Eaton, Allen, Smart
41-45: Sabonis the Younger, Halliburton, Bill, Hiro, Barrett
46-50: Poole, Fox, Wiggins, Lorry, Trent
51-55: Maxi, Mills Bridges, Brenson, Mills Bridges, Valenquinas
56-60: Randall, Bain, Jalen Jr., Scottie Barnes, Mobley
61-65: Polzingis, Cunningham, Kuzma, Russell, Visho
66-70: Collins, Rozil, Lefu, Anunobi, Capella
71-75: Little Curry, Rowe, Cole Anthony, Clarkson, Portis